3 Justifications Against Manchester United Continuing to Pursue Mason Mount

Manchester United’s final offer to Chelsea for Mason Mount has been rejected, but both teams are willing to reach an acceptable agreement. Here are some reasons Manchester United should reject the agreement.

Recent rumors state that Chelsea has turned down Manchester United’s £55 million offer for Mason Mount. The Stamford Bridge organization has set a £65 million price tag on the services of the Red Devils. Manchester United is hesitant to go over their allotted transfer budget for a player with just one year left on his deal, though.

The opinions of Chelsea’s supporters on Mason Mount are split. The Blues are willing to meet with officials of Manchester United and come to an amicable agreement before the new season even though they rejected the offer.

3 arguments against Manchester United terminating the Mason Mount agreement

1. Mason Mount wants to depart because he is in the last year of his contract.

Since the 2022/23 season’s conclusion, Mason Mount has pushed for the transfer. The 24 years old will begin his final year of employment on July 1 and has no plans to extend his contract at Stamford Bridge. Additionally, Chelsea has spent a lot of money during the last two transfer windows. The Blues may need to think about selling off players, like Mason Mount, in order to navigate the potential FFP issue and relieve any pressure that could result from FFP scrutiny.

2. Poor campaigning by Mount

Mason Mount had a difficult 2022/2023 season and saw a considerable drop in performance from his strong 2021/22 season. During the 2021/2022 season, the 24 years old midfielder made 32 appearances in the English top division and amassed an astounding 21 goals and assists. However, Mount’s effectiveness waned the next season, recording only 5 goals and assists in 24 games. His advancing passes per 90 minutes declined from 6.24 to 5.36, and his pass completion rate fell from 78.1% to 75.2%. Furthermore, Mount made meager contributions to other competitions, failing to have a big impact. The competitor failed to make an impression in subsequent tournaments. His season long pelvis injury did not help matters.

When comparing campaigns across all competitions, Manchester United midfielder Fred had a more successful year overall. Throughout the season, the Brazilian player scored 11 goals and provided 11 assists. While it is true that Mount has tremendous potential for a brighter future given his youth, Manchester United must also take into account Fred’s value in the market. The Old Trafford team has to use Fulham’s £10 million valuation of the 30 years old midfielder as a key benchmark as they get ready to negotiate.

3. There are better choices and unfilled priority targets

As they want to bolster their team in strategic areas this summer, Manchester United has a list of priorities. They have a ball playing goalie, a prolific striker, and a midfielder on their list of targets. As they consider David de Gea’s future, the Red Devils have been linked with possible additions like Andre Onana and Diogo Costa to strengthen their goalkeeping alternatives.

Victor Osimhen and Rasmus Hojlund are two effective strikers that Old Trafford wants among the attackers. None of these players would be inexpensive, and Manchester United would wind up spending more than they had planned.

However, there are more suitable candidates to fill the midfield position. Declan Rice and Moises Caicedo, for example, are up for grabs in the transfer window, and the team has been connected with both. Caicedo is of particular interest since he could cover for Casemiro at a cost comparable to Chelsea’s Mason Mount asking price.

Should Manchester United increase its offer to get Mason Mount or hold out until January to secure him at a lower cost? Please comment below.

Leave a Comment